BROWN et al v. RIDLEY TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 41) IS DENIED. JUISTI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44) IS GRANTED. ROWAN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 46) IS GRANTED. ROWAN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (D OC. 52). CLERK OF COURT SHALL DOCKET EXHIBIT A OF ROWAN'S MOTION. JUISTI'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (DOC. 53) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL DOCKET EXHIBIT A OF JUISTI'S MOTION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 3/7/16. 3/7/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, ) (Main Document 57 replaced on 3/7/2016) (rf, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KIYEAN BROWN and ERIN BEAN
v.
MATTHEW ROWAN, and
JOSEPH JUISTI
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-5874
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion
to compel (docket entry #41), defendant Joseph Juisti’s motion for summary judgment (docket
entry #44), defendant Matthew Rowan’s motion for summary judgment (docket entry #46),
plaintiffs’ responses in opposition thereto, Rowan’s motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry
#52), Juisti’s motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry #53), and plaintiffs’ responses in
opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel (docket entry #41) is DENIED;
2.
Juisti’s motion for summary judgment (docket entry #44) is GRANTED;
3.
Rowan’s motion for summary judgment (docket entry #46) is GRANTED;
4.
Rowan’s motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry #52) is GRANTED;
5.
The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET Exhibit A of Rowan’s motion;
6.
Juisti’s motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry #53) is GRANTED;
7.
The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET Exhibit A of Juisti’s motion; and
8.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.
BY THE COURT:
_/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J.
Stewart Dalzell, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?