ZEIGENFUSE v. KEMP & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Filing 27

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 8 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOITON TO REMAND 11 IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/17/15. 3/17/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID ZEIGENFUSE
Plaintiff

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-05954

v.
KEMP & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendants
ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 10), Defendant’s Reply
(Doc. No. 16), Plaintiff’s Sur-reply (Doc. No. 20), and the parties’ positions at oral argument, it
is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to
Remand (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.