LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSE, SA v. FINANCIAL SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Filing
40
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED, ETC. PLFF'S REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 10/9/15. 10/9/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES
SUISSE, SA
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-05995
Plaintiff
v.
FINANCIAL SOFTWARE SYSTEMS,
INC.
Defendant
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31),
all briefs filed in support of or opposition to those motions (Doc. Nos. 32, 35, 37, 38), and the
undisputed material facts of record, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED;
2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED;
3. The January 18, 2013 judgment issued in favor Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse
SA and against Financial Software Systems, Inc. by the High Court of Justice,
Queen’s Bench Division, Manchester District Registry, Mercantile Court, Manchester,
United Kingdom is RECOGNIZED AS VALID pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Uniform
Foreign Money Judgment Recognition Act, 42 P.S. §§ 22001, et seq.
4. Plaintiff’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?