EGLI v. STRIMEL et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT RADNOR STUDIO 21 AND GEORGE STRIMEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS 4 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; VERIZON COMMUNICATION, INC.'S MOTION 5 IS GRANTED AND VERIZON IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION; RADNOR TOWNSHIP'S MOTION 7 I S GRANTED AND RADNOR IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION; DEFENDANTS RADNOR STUDIO 21 AND GEORGE STRIMEL ARE DIRECTED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, NO LATER THAN 20 DAYS FROM ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 8/28/15. 8/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EGLI v. STRIMEL, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6204 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Radnor Studio 21 and George Strimel’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF Document. No. 4), Defendant Radnor Township’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7), Defendant Verizon Communications, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), Plaintiff’s responses in opposition thereto (Docs. 9, 12), Defendants’ replies (Docs. 10, 13), and Plaintiff’s sur-reply (Doc. 16), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Radnor Studio 21 and George Strimel’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Defendants’ Motion is denied as to Count I for a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and granted as to all other claims; 2. Verizon Communications, Inc.’s Motion (Doc. 5) is GRANTED and Verizon Communications, Inc. is dismissed from this action; 3. Radnor Township’s Motion (Doc. 7) is GRANTED and Radnor Township is dismissed from this action; 4. Defendants Radnor Studio 21 and George Strimel are directed to file an Answer to Count I of Plaintiff’s Complaint, for a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only, no later than 20 days from entry of this Order. 1 BY THE COURT: /s/ L. Felipe Restrepo _____________________________ L. FELIPE RESTREPO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?