MARRERO v. COLEMAN et al
Filing
9
ORDER THAT UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONER 039;S PETITION SHALL CONTINUE TO BE STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE CONCLUSION OF PETITIONER'S STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. PETITIONER SHALL RETURN TO THIS COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/9/16. 5/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRACEY HECTOR MARRERO,
CIVIL ACTION
Petitioner,
v.
BRIAN COLEMAN, et al.,
No. 14-6231
Respondents.
FILED
MAY 0.-9 2016
ORDER
MICHAELE. KUNZ, Clerk
By
Dep. Clerk
HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH, J.
AND NOW, this 9+-A
day of M
4
'1
, 2016, upon careful and independent
consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus shall continue to be STA YED and
held in ABEYANCE pending the conclusion of Petitioner's state court proceedings
on his petitions filed pursuant to the Pennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief Act.
3. Petitioner shall return to this Court within thirty days following the conclusion of his
state court proceedings. If Petitioner does not return to federal court within that time,
this stay and abeyance order will be vacated and his petition will be denied without
prejudice.
4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
A~ tl.·Ac.~./~
GERALD A. MCHUGH
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?