MARRERO v. COLEMAN et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONER&# 039;S PETITION SHALL CONTINUE TO BE STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE CONCLUSION OF PETITIONER'S STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. PETITIONER SHALL RETURN TO THIS COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/9/16. 5/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRACEY HECTOR MARRERO, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, v. BRIAN COLEMAN, et al., No. 14-6231 Respondents. FILED MAY 0.-9 2016 ORDER MICHAELE. KUNZ, Clerk By Dep. Clerk HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH, J. AND NOW, this 9+-A day of M 4 '1 , 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus shall continue to be STA YED and held in ABEYANCE pending the conclusion of Petitioner's state court proceedings on his petitions filed pursuant to the Pennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief Act. 3. Petitioner shall return to this Court within thirty days following the conclusion of his state court proceedings. If Petitioner does not return to federal court within that time, this stay and abeyance order will be vacated and his petition will be denied without prejudice. 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: A~ tl.·Ac.~./~ GERALD A. MCHUGH U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?