WARREN v. KING et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 45) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED IN THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 52) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 4/27/16. 4/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LENORA KING, et. al.,
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 45), Plaintiff’s
Motion in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 53), Plaintiff’s Cross
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 52), and Defendants
Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 54), it is hereby ORDERED
that the Defendants’ Motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part
1. On the issue of whether Mr. Warren can claim compensatory
damages for any of his claims, we GRANT summary judgment to the
2. On all other issues, Summary Judgment for the Defendants is
It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is DENIED.
The issues on which the Court has denied summary judgment are
left for resolution at trial.
BY THE COURT:
S/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?