LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
Filing
122
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFF JENN-CHING LUO FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT IN LUO I, CIV. A. NO. 14-6354 (DOC. # 115 ), LUO IV, CIV. A. NO. 16-6568 (DOC. # 35), AND LUO V, CIV. A. NO. 17-1508 (DOC. # 29), DATED OCTOBER 5, 2023, ARE DENIED; AS OUTLINED HEREREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/30/23. 10/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JENN-CHING LUO
v.
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.
JENN-CHING LUO
v.
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.
JENN-CHING LUO
v.
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.
JENN-CHING LUO
v.
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6354
NO. 16-6568
NO. 17-1508
NO. 21-1098
ORDER
AND NOW, this
30th
day of October, 2023, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
(1)
The motions of plaintiff Jenn-Ching Luo for entry
of default in Luo I, Civ. A. No. 14-6354 (Doc. # 115), Luo IV,
Civ. A. No. 16-6568 (Doc. # 35), and Luo V, Civ. A. No. 17-1508
(Doc. # 29), dated October 5, 2023, are DENIED.
(2)
Pursuant to Judge O’Neill’s order, dated November
28, 2016, all claims against defendant Owen J. Roberts School
District in Luo I, Civ. A. No. 14-6354, are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
(3)
Defendant Geoffrey Ball may FILE A RENEWED MOTION
TO DISMISS in Luo I, Civ. A. No. 14-6354, to the Section 1983
claims against him in Luo I within twenty days of this order.
Otherwise, he shall file an answer within twenty days.
(4)
All claims in Luo IV, Civ. A. No. 16-6568, are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The clerk shall mark this case
closed.
(5)
All claims in Luo V, Civ. A. No. 17-1508, are
DISMISSSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The clerk shall mark this case
closed.
(6)
The IDEA claim against defendant Owen J. Roberts
School District in Luo VI, Civ. A. No. 21-1098, is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
(7)
Defendant Pennsylvania Department of Education
may FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS in Luo VI, Civ. A. No.
21-1098, to the IDEA claim against it within twenty days of this
order.
Otherwise, it shall file an answer within twenty days.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
-2-
Harvey Bartle III
___
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?