TORRES v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC

Filing 31

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 20 ) IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF (ECF NO. 22 ) IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A NOTICE OF SUPPL EMENTAL AUTHORITY (ECF NO. 25 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 23 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT; PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR INTERIM APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL (ECF NO. 11) IS DENIED AS MOOT; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/7/15. 4/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARGARET TORRES,
on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6542

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2015, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
(1)

Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20) is
GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with
prejudice;

(2)

Defendant’s motion for leave to file a reply
brief (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED;1

(3)

Defendant’s motion for leave to file a notice of
supplemental authority (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED;2

(4)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 23) is
DENIED as moot;

1

The Court considered the contents of the reply brief
in its determination of the motion to dismiss.
2

The Court considered the contents of Defendant’s
notice of supplemental authority, as well as the contents of
Plaintiff’s notice of supplemental authority (ECF No. 27), in
its determination of the motion to dismiss.

(5)

Plaintiff’s motion for interim appointment of
class counsel (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as moot; and

(6)

The Clerk of Court shall mark the case CLOSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.

2