HARTY v. AZAD HOLDINGS LLC
Filing
21
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AFTER DEFAULT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL SECTIONS OF THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT. PLAINTIFF MUST SERVE THIS ORDER UPON DEFENDANT AZAD HOLDINGS LLC AND BURGER KING WITHIN 5 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER AND FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON THE DOCKET. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 7/27/16. 7/28/16\ ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OWEN HARTY
:
:
:
:
:
v.
AZAD HOLDINGS LLC
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6566
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of
July , 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion
for Judgment After Default (ECF No. 4), and after damages hearings held on May 24, 2016, and
June 27, 2016, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Owen
Harty, and against Defendant Azad Holdings, LLC.
2.
Defendant Azad Holdings, LLC, shall comply with all sections of the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq. (“ADA”), including all
regulations promulgated for implementation of the ADA, as specifically set forth
in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Defendant must file a Notice of Compliance with the
Court within ninety (90) days of the date of this Order. The Notice of
Compliance must specifically set forth the efforts taken by Defendant to regain
compliance with the ADA. Failure to file the Notice of Compliance will result in
contempt proceedings.
3.
Plaintiff must serve this Order upon (1) Defendant Azad Holdings, LLC; and
(2) Burger King, 2728 S. Front St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19148-4808,
within five (5) days of the date of this Order, and file a certificate of service on
the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
______________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?