SIMMERS v. ELO et al

Filing 43

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRNATED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/18/2016. 3/18/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES SIMMERS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. JAMES ELO; MIKE KELLY; TIMOTHY DEERY; JOSE COLLAZO; JAMES W. AVERY; JOSEPH RALSTON; ANDREW KELLY; NEHEMIAH HAIGLER; JOHN BRENNAN; AVRIL EKLUND; TIMOTHY RILEY; and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25, Defendants. NO. 14-6609 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 40), and Defendants’ Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 41), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of Defendants and AGAINST Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: /S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?