SIMMERS v. ELO et al
Filing
43
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRNATED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/18/2016. 3/18/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES SIMMERS,
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES ELO; MIKE KELLY; TIMOTHY
DEERY; JOSE COLLAZO; JAMES W.
AVERY; JOSEPH RALSTON; ANDREW
KELLY; NEHEMIAH HAIGLER; JOHN
BRENNAN; AVRIL EKLUND; TIMOTHY
RILEY; and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
NO. 14-6609
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 40), and
Defendants’ Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 41), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of
Defendants and AGAINST Plaintiff.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
/S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?