BIDDLE v. GRANDVIEW HOSPITAL

Filing 27

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS 23 , AND PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT GRANDVIEW HOSPITAL'S REQUEST FOR FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FILING OF ITS SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/5/15. 6/5/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BYRON BIDDLE,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-06614

v.
GRANDVIEW HOSPITAL,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the unopposed Motion to
Dismiss filed by Defendant Grandview Hospital, (Doc. No. 23), and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c),
it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and the Amended Complaint is
DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Grandview Hospital’s request for fees and
costs associated with the filing of its second motion to dismiss is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.