DOCKERY v. GIROUX et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTIY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/27/17. 3/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICKY DOCKERY,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6636

V.

NANCY GIROUX, et. al.
Respondents.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March 2017, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate
Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 28), Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 30), a thorough and
independent review of the record, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this day, it is
ORDERED as follows:

1.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Perkin (Doc. No. 28) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;

3.

A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT be issued based on the analysis
contained in Magistrate Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation, as approved
and adopted by this Court, that a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the
Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Writ of Habeas Corpus; and

4.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT: