SABOL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filing 47

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT #33 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/16/15. 7/16/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PATRICIA SABOL
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 14-6654

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2015, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that
the motion of defendant Ford Motor Company for summary judgment
(doc. # 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
(1)

the motion of defendant for summary judgment on

plaintiff’s “First Cause of Action” (pleading liability under the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) is GRANTED
insofar as that claim is premised on the advertising statements
identified by plaintiff;
(2)

the motion of defendant for summary judgment on

plaintiff’s “Second Cause of Action” (pleading breach of express
warranty) is GRANTED insofar as that claim is premised on the
advertising statements identified by plaintiff;
(3)

the motion of defendant for summary judgment on

plaintiff’s “Fourth Cause of Action” (pleading unjust enrichment)
is GRANTED;
(4)

the motion of defendant for summary judgment on

plaintiff’s “Fifth Cause of Action” (pleading liability under the

Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73
Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 201-1 et seq.) is GRANTED insofar as that
claim is premised on defendant’s alleged misrepresentations and
fraudulent omissions; and
(5)

the motion of defendant for summary judgment is

otherwise DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.

-2-