WILLIAMS et al v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al

Filing 44

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. THE COURT'S 1/14/15 ORDER IS VACATED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 2/25/15. 2/25/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GARY WILLIAMS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., UHAUL CO. OF CALIFORNIA, COLUSA
QUICK SERVICE MARKET, K&B
TRANS., INC.
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6727

ORDER

AND NOW, this __25th__ day of February, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 31) and Defendants U-Haul International, Inc.’s, U-Haul Co.
of California’s, and Colusa Quick Service Market’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 36), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration is
GRANTED.1 The Court’s January 14, 2015 Order (Doc. 28) is VACATED. Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is DENIED in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Reply to
Opposition of Defendants (Doc. 38) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
____________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.C.J.

1

This Order accompanies the Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated February 25, 2015.