WASHINGTON v. WENEROWICZ et al

Filing 60

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED ON TH FIRST AMENDMENT, FIFTH AMENDMENT, EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS; ALL CLAIMS IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/3/17. 10/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH BARRY WASHINGTON, SR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-06916 v. SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL WENEROWICZ et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of October 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 53), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 55), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 57), and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51) is GRANTED on the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment claims. 2. All claims in the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y_ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?