FLICK v. CHARTWELL ADVISORY GROUP LTD. et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. COUNTS I-IV OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT STEPHEN DEVINEY'S ERISA CROSS-CLAIMS IN COUNTS I AND II ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNTS V-XII OF THE COMPLAINT, DEVINEY& #039;S COUNTERCLAIM COUNTS I AND II, DEVINEY'S CROSS-CLAIM COUNTS III AND IV, AND CHARTWELL ADVISORY GROUP LTD, LAWRENCE KENT, MAURICE KENT, AND LAWRENCE PALMER'S CROSS-CLAIM COUNTS I-II ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 7/16/2015. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/2/2015. 7/2/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM O. FLICK, JR., CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-06953 Plaintiff, v. CHARTWELL ADVISORY GROUP LTD. et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants Chartwell Advisory Group LTD., Lawrence Kent, Maurice Kent, and Lawrence Palmer’s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 7), Plaintiff’s opposition, (ECF No. 11), Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 12), and Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (ECF No. 16), it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that: 1. Counts I-IV of the complaint are dismissed without prejudice. 2. Defendant Stephen Deviney’s ERISA cross-claims in Counts I and II are dismissed without prejudice. 3. Counts V-XII of the complaint, Deviney’s counterclaim Counts I and II, Deviney’s cross-claim Counts III and IV, and Chartwell Advisory Group LTD, Lawrence Kent, Maurice Kent, and Lawrence Palmer’s cross-claim Counts I-II are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 4. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before July 16, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?