HAYNES v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _____ et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY 17 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 02/21/2017. 02/22/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAWUD HAYNES, Petitioner, v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _________, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6993 O R D E R AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2017, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF No. 17) and Petitioner’s Objections thereto (ECF No. 18), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; (3) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) A certificate of appealability shall not issue; and (5) The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?