HAYNES v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _____ et al
Filing
21
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY 17 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 02/21/2017. 02/22/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAWUD HAYNES,
Petitioner,
v.
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE
COUNTY OF _________, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-6993
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2017, after review
of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF No. 17) and Petitioner’s Objections
thereto (ECF No. 18), and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
(2)
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and
Recommendation are OVERRULED;
(3)
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1)
is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
(4)
A certificate of appealability shall not issue; and
(5)
The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?