DAVIS v. WELLS FARGO et al

Filing 51

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT 13 IS DENIED; WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS 18 IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST WELLS FARGO ARE DISMISSED; ASSURANT INC'S MOTION TO DISMISS 35 IS GRANTED. PLAINTFF'S CLAIM AGAINST ASSURANT ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/8/15. 6/8/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL EARL DAVIS
Plaintiff

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-07014

v.
WELLS FARGO U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT
LOAN TRUST, 2005-11
and ASSURANT, INC.
Defendants
ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to
Amend/Correct (Doc. No. 13), Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18),
Defendant Assurant, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35) and all briefs filed in support of or
opposition to those motions (Doc. Nos. 19, 28, 30, 44, 48), it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED;
2. Wells Fargo’s Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo are
DISMISSED;
3. Assurant Inc.’s Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Assurant are
DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.