DAVIS v. WELLS FARGO et al

Filing 61

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF MICHAEL EARL DAVIS'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 45 AND DEFENDANT ASSURANT, INC.'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION 49 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/23/16. 8/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL EARL DAVIS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-07014 v. WELLS FARGO U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST, 2005-11 and ASSURANT, INC., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Michael Earl Davis’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 45) and Defendant Assurant, Inc.’s response in opposition (ECF No. 49), it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?