JUNKINS-HOPKINS v. THE JOHN HOPKINS HOSPITAL et al

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM, WHICH IS DISMISSED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO HER CLAIM UNDER 42 USC:1981. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO HER BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER AND SUBSTANTIALLY AS PROPOSED ON OR BEFORE 6/5/15. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/26/15. 5/26/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DR. JACQUELINE M. JUNKINS-HOPKINS CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-07080 Plaintiff v. THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, et al. Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 12), and all briefs filed in support of or opposition thereto (Doc. Nos. 13, 15, 16), it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, which is DISMISSED. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED in all other respects. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to her claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED with respect to her breach of contract claim. 3. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint consistent with this Order and substantially as proposed on or before June 5, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?