SANTIAGO et al v. HULMES et al
Filing
6
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS POLICE COMMISSIONER CHARLES RAMSEY, FIRST DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RICAHRD ROSS JR., DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS KEVIN BETHEL, THOMAS WRIGHT, WILLIAM BLACKBURN, A ND DENISE TURPIN ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF CLAIMS FOR FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT, AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS FOR NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, NEGLIGENCE, DEFAMATION, AND INVASION OF PRIVACY ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 4/20/2015. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/30/2015. 3/30/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALEXIS SANTIAGO, et al.
Plaintiffs
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-07109
v.
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, et al.
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
For Partial Dismissal (Doc. No. 3), to which no opposition was filed, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Motion is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, First
Deputy Commissioner Richard Ross Jr., Deputy Commissioners Kevin Bethel, Thomas Wright,
William Blackburn, and Denise Turpin are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. Plaintiffs’ claims for False Arrest (Count II), False Imprisonment (Count III), and
Malicious Prosecution (Count IV) are DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
4. Plaintiffs’ claims for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (Count VI),
Negligence (Count VIII), Defamation (Count IX), and Invasion of Privacy (Count X) are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
5. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an Amended Complaint, consistent with this
Order, on or before April 20, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?