DAVID v. ECKARD et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL A FINAL DECISION IS RENDERED IN WASHINGTON v. SECRETARY PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 801 F.3d 160 (3d Cir. 2015). THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/16/16. 3/17/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-07123-JHS Document 26-1 Filed 01/28/16 Page 1of1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL DAVID, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, v. J. A. ECKARD, et al., No. 14-7123 Respondents. I ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. ! AND NOW, this ((,I( day of M lh(W, 2016, upon careful and independeft consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED tJat: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is STAYED and held in ABEYANCE until a final decision is rendered in Washington v. Secretary Pa. Dept. of Corredtions, 801F.3d160 (3d Cir. 2015). 3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: M~ 00ELii SLOMSKY U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ENTERED MAR l 7 2016 CLERK OF COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?