CASE v. TRITT et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THERE HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIF ICATE OF APPEALABILITY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 7/29/15. 7/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION
: NO. 14-7124
BRENDA TRITT, ET AL.
AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of
the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Respondents’
Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 12), the Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. 14), Petitioner’s Written Objection thereto
(Doc. 17), and all other responses, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
3. There has been no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right requiring the
issuance of a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned
case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?