BARRERA v. COUNTY OF BERKS
Filing
29
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT (ECF 15) RESPONSE IS OPPOSITION (ECF 17) IS GRANTED AND THE ATTACHED AMENDED RESPONSE (ECF-17) SHALL BE CONSIDERED DOCKETED. DEFENDANT BUCK'S COUNTY MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF-5) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF BUCKS MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF -12) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/22/15. 7/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROSIE I. BARRERA,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 14-7136
COUNTY OF BUCKS, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct ECF 15 Response in Opposition (ECF 17) is
GRANTED and the attached Amended Response (ECF 17-1) shall be considered
docketed.
2. In light of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 9), Defendant County of Bucks’s
Motion to Dismiss (ECF 5) is DENIED AS MOOT.
3. After consideration of Defendant County of Bucks’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF 12)
and Plaintiff’s Amended Response (ECF 17-1), the Motion to Dismiss is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 14\14-7136 barrera v. ctny bucks\14cv7136.Order.re.Barrera.MTD.2015.07.20.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?