BARRERA v. COUNTY OF BERKS

Filing 29

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT (ECF 15) RESPONSE IS OPPOSITION (ECF 17) IS GRANTED AND THE ATTACHED AMENDED RESPONSE (ECF-17) SHALL BE CONSIDERED DOCKETED. DEFENDANT BUCK'S COUNTY MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF-5) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF BUCKS MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF -12) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/22/15. 7/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSIE I. BARRERA, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 14-7136 COUNTY OF BUCKS, et al. Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct ECF 15 Response in Opposition (ECF 17) is GRANTED and the attached Amended Response (ECF 17-1) shall be considered docketed. 2. In light of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 9), Defendant County of Bucks’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 5) is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. After consideration of Defendant County of Bucks’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF 12) and Plaintiff’s Amended Response (ECF 17-1), the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 14\14-7136 barrera v. ctny bucks\14cv7136.Order.re.Barrera.MTD.2015.07.20.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?