MCLAUGHLIN v. BAYER, CORP. et al

Filing 435

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 5/24/2019. 5/24/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HELEN McLAUGHLIN
v.
BAYER ESSURE, INC., et al.
And Related Actions

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-7315
NO. 18-5365 (Gastelum)
NO. 18-5343 (Armstrong)
NO. 18-5345 (Blair)
NO. 18-5346 (Hooks)
NO. 18-5347 (Hoskins)
NO. 18-5348 (Hurt)
NO. 18-5349 (James)
NO. 18-5350 (Krueger)
NO. 18-5351 (Luterek)
NO. 18-5352 (Meachum)
NO. 18-5353 (Pearson)
NO. 18-5356 (Perdue)
NO. 18-5357 (Powell)
NO. 18-5358 (Purkey)
NO. 18-5359 (Stokes)
NO. 18-5360 (Teel)

NO. 18-5361 (Tester)
NO. 18-5362 (Botelho)
NO. 18-5363 (Cleland)
NO. 18-5364 (Gonzalez)
NO. 18-5366 (Garr)
NO. 18-5367 (Cortez)
NO. 18-5370 (Hope)
NO. 18-5371 (Forrest)
NO. 18-5372 (Grega)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Remand (Docket No. 350 in McLaughlin; Docket No. 4 in Gastelum), and all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT

/s/ John R. Padova, J.
_________________________________
John R. Padova, J.