MCLAUGHLIN v. BAYER, CORP. et al

Filing 616

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS ADOPTED APPROVED and ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 8 OF THE AGREED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF THE SPECIAL DISCOVERY MASTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 5/1/2020. 5/5/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Case 2:14-cv-07315-JP Document 616 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HELEN McLAUGHLIN
v.
BAYER ESSURE, INC., et al.
And Related Actions

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-7315
NO. 14-7316 (Ruble)
NO. 14-7318 (Stelzer)
NO. 14-7317 (Strimel)
NO. 15-0384 (Walsh)
NO. 16-1458 (Dunstan)
NO. 16-1645 (Clarke)
NO. 16-1921 (Souto)
NO. 16-2166 (Bailey)
NO. 16-2154 (Campos)
NO. 16-2717 (Bolds)
NO. 16-3049 (Tulgetske)
NO. 16-3409 (Abeyta)
NO. 16-3589 (Burgis)
NO. 16-3710 (Dong)
NO. 16-3730 (Mantor)
NO. 16-3731 (Olague)

NO. 16-3732 (Gross)
NO. 16-3733 (Johnson)
NO. 16-3766 (Summerlin)
NO. 16-3767 (Rodvill)
NO. 16-3769 (Bennett)
NO. 16-4081 (Quinton)
NO. 17-2915 (Wistrom)
NO. 17-3968 (Bobo)
NO. 17-4417 (Guess)
NO. 17-4936 (Gonzalez)
NO. 18-37 (Jenson)
NO. 18-836 (Morua)
NO. 18-837 (Galan)
NO. 18-838 (Alfaro)
NO. 18-908 (Archer)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2020, upon consideration of the Special Master’s April
13, 2020 “Report and Recommendations to Resolve a Dispute Regarding the Order re: Protocol
Governing Case-Specific Fact Depositions and Discovery” (Docket No. 608 in McLaughlin), to
which no objections have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in accordance
with Paragraph 8 of the Agreed Case Management Order Concerning Appointment of
the Special Discovery Master (Docket No. 254 in McLaughlin).

2. Contemporaneously with this Order, the Court will enter the parties’ proposed Order
Re: Protocol Governing Case-Specific Fact Deposition and Discovery, which,
consistent with the Report and Recommendation, will include Plaintiffs’ Proposed
Paragraph 15 and Defendants’ Proposed Paragraph 16, except insofar as Defendants’

Case 2:14-cv-07315-JP Document 616 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2

Proposed Paragraph 16 requests subject matter limitations on the content of ex parte
communications with healthcare providers.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova, J.
_________________________________
John R. Padova, J.

2