MINA v. ENET ADVERTISING et al

Filing 5

(DOCKETED IN DUPLICATE) ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (DOC. NO. 1 ) IS DENIED AND THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/10/15. 2/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DOCKETED IN DUPLICATE) (mas, ) Modified on 2/11/2015 (mas, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY STOCKER MINA, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-MC-254 Plaintiff, v. ENET ADVERTISING, OPTIMA WEB DESIGN, RON SHUR, NICKOLAI POTAPOV, and JUDGE JOHN L. BRAXTON, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2015, the prose plaintiff, Anthony Stocker Mina, having filed an application to proceed see Doc. in forma pauperis and a motion for relief from judgment, No. 1; and for the reasons set forth in the court's accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: informa pauperis is GRANTED; 1. The plaintiffs application to proceed 2. The motion for relief under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. The clerk of court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: c:l: 4 EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?