KLEIN v. KAUFFMAN et al

Filing 48

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 19) IS ADOPTED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS GRANTED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 3/20/19. 3/20/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES KLEIN, Petitioner, v. KEVIN KAUFMANN, et al., Respondent. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0065 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner’s Amended Petition (Doc. No. 12), Respondent’s Response (Doc. No. 15), Petitioner’s Traverse (Doc. No. 17), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret (Doc. No. 19), Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. No. 26), and Respondents’ Response to Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. No. 30), following an evidentiary hearing before Judge Lloret, and upon thorough consideration of the state court record, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is ADOPTED IN PART as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and 3. A certificate of appealability is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: _/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg________ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?