GORDON v. WILLIAMS et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AGAINST PLAINTIFF. FURTHER ORDERED THAT CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/2/15. 11/3/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEITH ANDRE GORDON,
POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL
WILLIAMS, et al.,
AND NOW, this __2nd__ day of November, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s
Complaint (Doc. 1), Defendants Sergeant Daniel Dutch, Officer Carol Williams, Officer Michael
Williams, and the City of Philadelphia’s Answer to the Complaint (Doc. 11), Defendants’
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 20), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 21), Defendants’
Reply (Doc. 24), and the record of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED
that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED 1 and JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of
Defendants and against Plaintiff.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned
case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
This Order accompanies the Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated November 2, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?