PRICE et al v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM 57 , IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 49 IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 48 IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 10/14/16. 10/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARY E. PRICE
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Mary E.
Price’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant Upper Darby School District’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion, and the parties’ presentations
at the June 13, 2016, oral argument, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion (Document 49) is DENIED; and
2. Defendant’s Motion (Document 48) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of
Defendant as to all claims.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez s
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?