DIXON v. MAHOLLY et al

Filing 31

ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL REMOVE THIS CASE FORM SUSPENSE AND RETURN IT OT THE ACTIVE DOCKET; THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOIPOTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATGE OF APPEALABILTY AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/28/16. 11/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL DIXON, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0l~i v. ,_ED ·' .6 LAWRENCE MAHOLLY, et al., Respondents. 9 2016 LUCY \i CHIN. Interim Clerk g¥ = pep.Clerk ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of November 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and all related filings, and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell and the objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE the case from Civil Suspense and return it to the active docket; 2. The Objections are OVERRULED; 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 4. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without an evidentiary hearing; 5. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and 6. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: YNTHIA M. RUFE, J~~

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?