LONG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND DOROTHY CAMASSO'S MOTION TO DISMISS, PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE, DEFENDANTS' REPLY AND ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON JANUARY 12, 2016 IS GRANTED AND ALL FEDERAL LAW CLAIMS AGAINST CAMASSO AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/15/16. 1/15/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GARY LONG, JR.,
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants
Montgomery County and Dorothy Camasso’s (“Camasso”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28),
Plaintiff Gary Long, Jr.’s Response (ECF No. 29), Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 30), and oral
argument heard on January 12, 2016 (ECF No. 36), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is
GRANTED. All federal law claims against Camasso and Montgomery County are dismissed
with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law
claims against Camasso.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?