IN RE: STEPHEN DEITCH
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT'S ORDER OF 12/3/2014 IS VACATED AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE BANKRUPTCY COURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DISMISS THE DEBTOR-APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TO THE APPELLEE'S PROOF OF CLAIM FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION UNDER THE ROOKER-FELDMAN DOCTRINE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 6/15/15. 6/15/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE:
STEPHEN DEITCH,
Debtor.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-204
STEPHEN DEITCH,
Appellant,
BANKRUPTCY
v.
NO. 13-10121
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
Appellee.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the Debtor-Appellant
Stephen Deitch’s initial brief [ECF No. 5] and the Appellee Federal National Mortgage
Association’s brief in response [ECF No. 6], after oral argument held on May 8, 2015, and for
the reasons provided in the Court’s Opinion of June 15, 2015 [ECF No. 10], IT IS ORDERED
that the Bankruptcy Court’s order of December 3, 2014 [Bankr. No. 13-10121, Docket No. 177],
is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Bankruptcy Court with instructions to
dismiss the Debtor-Appellant’s Objection to the Appellee’s Proof of Claim for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction under the Rooker–Feldman doctrine.
BY THE COURT:
/S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?