STOCHEL et al v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS DAUBERT MOTION TO PRECLUDE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/9/15. 12/9/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COLLEEN M. BRADLEY CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2681 WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM HIGHER EDUCATION et al. ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, upon consideration of Defendants’ West Chester University of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (“West Chester”), the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (“PASSHE”), Mark Mixner (“Mixner”), Lawrence A. Dowdy (“Dowdy”), Dr. Gregory Weisenstein (“Weisenstein”), Dr. Mark G. Pavlovich (“Pavlovich”), Lois M. Johnson (“Johnson”), and Ginger Coleman (“Coleman” and, together with Mixner, Dowdy, Weisenstein, Pavlovich and Johnson, the “Individual Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 3), and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, as to Count I. Plaintiff’s claims against West Chester and PASSHE under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims against the Individual Defendants under § 1983 are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to amend. The Court will withhold ruling on the Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III pending an Amended Complaint. If there is no Amended Complaint, they will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 15\15-2681 BRADLEY V. WEST CHESTER\15CV2681.ORDER MTD.DOCX

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?