RASHID v. ORTIZ
Filing
15
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION THE MOTION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANT FILING A TIMELY 2255 PETITION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE FINAL DISPOSITION OF 2241 PETITION 13 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS FURTHER DIRECTED TO FILE THIS ORDER AND THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION IN CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-493. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/21/16. 1/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMIN A. RASHID
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-274
v.
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-493
DAVID ORTIZ
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21th day of January 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1], the briefing in support thereof, and the response thereto,
it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion
the motion is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing a timely§ 2255 petition. It is
further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Expedite Final Disposition of 2241 Petition [Doc.
No. 13] is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. The Clerk is further
directed to FILE this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion in Criminal Action No.
08-493.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?