BRYANT v. COLLINS et al

Filing 66

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 63) IS GRANTED AND BRYANT'S CLAIMS FOR RICO VIOLATIONS, FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION (COUNTS I, II, IV AND V) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER BRYANT'S ASSAULT AND BATTERY CLAIM (CLAIM III). THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/13/2017. 4/13/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ahf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HAKIM BRYANT,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-00302

v.
MICHAEL COLLINS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants
Collins’s and Santiago’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63), and Plaintiff
Bryant’s response (ECF No. 64), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The motion (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED and Bryant’s claims for RICO violations,
false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution (Counts I, III, IV and
V) are DISMISSED with prejudice;
2. The Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over Bryant’s assault and battery
claim (Count II);
3. This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

23