RILEY v. GILMORE et al

Filing 27

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 15 IS DENIED; AND, THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 09/19/2016. 09/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO THE PRO SE PLAITNIFF AND E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL RILEY, : : : : : : : : : Petitioner, v. ROBERT GILMORE, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-351 O R D E R AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (ECF No. 16) and Petitioner’s objections thereto (ECF No. 21), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, the following is hereby ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in part; (2) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; (3) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) A certificate of appealability shall not issue; (5) Petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 15) is DENIED; and 1 (6) The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?