SHOFFNER et al v. WENEROWICZ et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 5 ) IS GRANTED: PLAINTIFFS PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; PLAINTIFFS FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIM (COUNT I) IS DISMISSED; PLAINTIFFS EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM (COUNT II) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE JULY 27, 2015. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/13/15. 7/13/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT SHOFFNER, et al. Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00392 v. MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, et al. Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5) and Plaintiffs’ response in opposition (Doc. No. 7), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED: 1. Plaintiffs’ putative class action claims are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; 2. Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim (Count I) is DISMISSED; 3. Plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claim (Count II) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before July 27, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?