PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Filing 16

ORDER THAT DEFTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: DEFT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT RELATES TO THE MARKETING AGREEMENT, & WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS III & IV IN THEIR ENTIRETY & DEFT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, ETC.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/6/15. 7/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., doing
business as “PLAN MANAGEMENT
CORP.,” and
JONATHAN MILLER,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-405

v.
BROADRIDGE INVESTOR
COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Broadridge Investor
Communication Solutions, Inc.’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 8, filed April 3, 2015);
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Document No.
13, filed May 4, 2015); and Defendant’s Reply in Further Support of Defendant Broadridge Investor
Communication Solutions, Inc.’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 14, filed May 11, 2015), for
the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated July 6, 2015, IT IS ORDERED that
Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1. Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Count II, to the extent that
it relates to the Marketing Agreement, and with respect to Counts III and IV in their entirety;
and
2. Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary pretrial conference will be scheduled in due
course. Discovery may proceed in the interim.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.