PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Filing 55

ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FULL & COMPLETE RESPONSES TO PLFFS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. DEFT'S OBJECTIONS TO THE INSTRUCTIONS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE RFA'S SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTION NUMBERS 7, 8, & 10 ARE SUSTAINED, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 2/7/17. 2/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PARAMOUNT FINANCIAL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a
PLAN MANAGEMENT CORP., et al.
v.
BROADRIDGE INVESTOR
COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-405

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiffs’
Motion to Compel Full and Complete Responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for
Admission (the “Motion,” Doc. 38), with an accompanying memorandum of law in support
thereof, and defendant’s Response in opposition to thereto (Doc. 48), and for the reasons set forth
in the accompanying Memorandum of Decision, it is hereby
ORDERED
1.

The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

2.

Defendant’s objections to the instructions at the beginning of the RFAs,

specifically instruction numbers 7, 8 and 10, are SUSTAINED.
3.

Defendant’s objections to the definitions at the beginning of the RFAs are

4.

Defendant’s objections to RFA Nos. 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14(a), 14(b),

DENIED.

16, 18, 23, 24, 26 and 27 are SUSTAINED and no responses are required. Plaintiffs’ Motion
with respect to these RFAs is DENIED.

5.

Defendant’s objections to RFA Nos. 2, 3, 4, 7, 13, 15(a), 15(b), 15(c),

15(d), 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 37 are OVERRULED and defendant
shall filed amended responses to these requests with any qualifications required. Plaintiffs’
Motion with respect to these RFAs is GRANTED.
6.

All responses by defendant required by the instant Order and the

accompanying Memorandum of Decision shall comply with Rule 36(a)(4) and shall be served
upon plaintiffs within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Thomas J. Rueter
THOMAS J. RUETER
United States Magistrate Judge

2