CAMBS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH A NOTICE OF DEPOSITION (DOC. NO. 45 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE PARTIES SHALL CONFER AND AGREE UPON A NEW DISCOVERY SCHEDULE TO BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 9/23/2016. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 9/12/2016. 9/12/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DENISE P. CAMBS
v.
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-428
ORDER
AND NOW on this 12th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of a motion by
defendant, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. i/s/h/a American Express
Company, Inc. for a protective order and to quash a notice of deposition, Dkt. No. 45, plaintiff
Denise P. Cambs’ response, Dkt. No. 47, and defendant’s reply, Dkt. No. 48, it is ORDERED
that defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. to the extent that defendant seeks to quash the Notice of Deposition of Ms. Anne M.
Jerez-Weston, the motion is GRANTED and the Notice of Deposition is QUASHED;
2. to the extent that defendant seeks a protective order precluding plaintiff from seeking the
deposition testimony of Anne M. Jerez-Weston or any other counsel or subordinate of
counsel of American Express, the motion is DENIED; and
3.
to the extent that defendant seeks a protective order limiting the scope of the deposition
of defendant’s corporate representative, the motion is DENIED.
In recognition that August 26, 2016 discovery deadline has passed, it is FURTHER
ORDERED that the parties shall confer and agree upon a new discovery schedule to be filed on
or before September 23, 2016.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?