VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. WHITCHURCH et al

Filing 132

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER WITH COUNTERCLAIM TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM IS STRICKEN. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO JOIN INDISPENSABLE PARTIES IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/23/15. 7/24/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al. v. JULIE P. WHITCHURCH, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-431 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer with Counterclaim to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. # 113) is DENIED; (2) defendants’ Counterclaim (Doc. # 111) is STRICKEN; and (3) defendants’ Motion for Leave to Join Indispensable Parties (Doc. # 111) is DENIED as moot. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III_______ J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?