VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. WHITCHURCH et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT UNDER RULES 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), 12(b)(7) OF THE FRCP (DOC. 16) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 4/1/15. 4/2/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANT, E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al. : : : : : : v. JULIE P. WHITCHURCH, et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-431 ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint under Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. # 16) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III________ J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?