VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. WHITCHURCH et al
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION OF PLAINTIFF VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS JULIE P. WHITCHURCH AND JAMIE DAVIS (DOC. 8) IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 4/29/15. 4/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANT, EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
et al.
v.
JULIE P. WHITCHURCH, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-431
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2015, based on the
court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED the motion of
plaintiff Vizant Technologies, LLC (“Vizant”) for a preliminary
injunction against defendants Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie
Davis (Doc. #8) is GRANTED as follows:
(1)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis, on or before
May 1, 2015, shall deliver to Vizant’s counsel all hard copies
in their possession of any cost reduction reports and other
confidential information that they received from Vizant or from
Vizant’s clients or third-party vendors during the terms of
their employment with Vizant;
(2)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis, on or before
May 1, 2015, shall delete from all computers and electronic
storage devices in their possession, and from all email accounts
controlled by either of them, all cost reduction reports and
other confidential information that they received from Vizant or
from Vizant’s clients or third-party vendors during the terms of
their employment with Vizant;
(3)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis, on or before
May 1, 2015, shall delete from all social media accounts
controlled by either of them, and from all websites controlled
by either of them, including www.nocapitalsolutions.com:
(a)
all cost reduction reports or other
confidential information that they received from
Vizant or from Vizant’s clients or third-party vendors
during the terms of their employment with Vizant, as
well as any references to any such reports or other
confidential information; and
(b)
all derogatory, unfavorable or threatening
references to or statements concerning:
Vizant;
Capital Solutions, Inc.; Joseph Bizzarro; Frank
Seidman; Lane Wiggers; and any of Vizant’s present or
past officers, directors, investors, employees, and
clients.
(4)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis are
preliminarily enjoined from engaging in any conduct or taking
any action whatsoever to cause or to discourage any person or
entity from doing business, investing in, or maintaining an
-2-
employment or other relationship with Vizant or with any entity
or person affiliated with Vizant;
(5)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis are
preliminarily enjoined from causing or encouraging any person or
entity to engage in any conduct that would violate this order;
(6)
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis, on or before
May 4, 2015, shall file with the court and serve on Vizant’s
counsel an affidavit declaring that they have fully complied
with paragraphs (1) through (3) of this preliminary injunction;
(7)
This preliminary injunction shall remain in
effect until further order of court, and binds the defendants
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis and their agents, servants,
employees and attorneys as well as other persons, who receive
actual notice of the preliminary injunction, by personal service
or otherwise and who are in active concert or participation with
them;
(8)
The motion of plaintiff Vizant is otherwise
DENIED; and
(9)
Plaintiff Vizant shall give security on or before
-3-
April 30, 2015 in the amount of $30,000 in accordance with Rule
65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Harvey Bartle III________
J.
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?