JONES et al v. GEMALTO, INCORPPORATED
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/29/2015. 6/29/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN R. JONES,
AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to
Remand, (ECF. No. 7), and Defendant’s response in opposition, (ECF. No. 9), as well as
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF. No. 5), and Plaintiff’s response in opposition, (ECF No.
8), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED and Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
The complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?