JONES et al v. GEMALTO, INCORPPORATED

Filing 11

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/29/2015. 6/29/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN R. JONES, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00673 Plaintiff, v. GEMALTO, INC., Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, (ECF. No. 7), and Defendant’s response in opposition, (ECF. No. 9), as well as Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF. No. 5), and Plaintiff’s response in opposition, (ECF No. 8), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED and Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?