MEHIGAN et al v. ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. et al
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING CLASS MEMBERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE 263 , IT IS ORDERED THAT CLASS MEMBERS COMLISH AND ARTLIP'S MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THEM TO RAISE OBJECTIONS TO FINAL DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER OUR 7/29/2016 ORDER 185 . SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/16/17. 6/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES, MAILED, AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROL ROUGVIE, et al.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC., et al.
AND NOW, this 16th day of June 2017, upon considering Class Members Comlish and
Artlip's Motion to intervene (ECF Doc. No. 263), Class Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No.
277), Responses of settling Objectors (ECF Doc. Nos. 278, 279, 280, 281, 282), Comlish and
Artlip's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 283), our June 5, 2017 Order regarding standing (ECF Doc. No.
285), the parties' and Objectors' Memoranda on standing (ECF Doc. Nos. 288, 289, 290, 291,
292), following oral argument and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
ORDERED Class Members Comlish and Artlip's Motion to intervene (ECF Doc. No. 263) is
DENIED without prejudice for them to raise objections to final distributions under our July 29,
2016 Order (ECF Doc. No. 185).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?