MEHIGAN et al v. ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. et al

Filing 299

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING CLASS MEMBERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE 263 , IT IS ORDERED THAT CLASS MEMBERS COMLISH AND ARTLIP'S MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THEM TO RAISE OBJECTIONS TO FINAL DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER OUR 7/29/2016 ORDER 185 . SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/16/17. 6/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES, MAILED, AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROL ROUGVIE, et al. CIVIL ACTION vs. NO. 15-724 ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC., et al. ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of June 2017, upon considering Class Members Comlish and Artlip's Motion to intervene (ECF Doc. No. 263), Class Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 277), Responses of settling Objectors (ECF Doc. Nos. 278, 279, 280, 281, 282), Comlish and Artlip's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 283), our June 5, 2017 Order regarding standing (ECF Doc. No. 285), the parties' and Objectors' Memoranda on standing (ECF Doc. Nos. 288, 289, 290, 291, 292), following oral argument and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Class Members Comlish and Artlip's Motion to intervene (ECF Doc. No. 263) is DENIED without prejudice for them to raise objections to final distributions under our July 29, 2016 Order (ECF Doc. No. 185).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?