RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC. et al

Filing 159

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 8/19/21. 8/20/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00921-DS Document 159 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al : : v. : : SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC., et al : CIVIL ACTION RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al CIVIL ACTION v. TRITON MARINE CONTRUCTION CORP. : : : : : : NO. 15-921 NO. 17-266 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2021, following upon our review of Defendants’ Triton Marine Construction Corporation (“Triton”), TranSystems Corporation (TranSystems”), and Shoreline Foundation, Inc. (“Shoreline”) “Joint Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order of July 2, 2021 Granting Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Preclude Defendants’ Expert DM Consulting/John Vitzthum,” (Civ. No. 17-266, Doc. 181) and Plaintiffs’ Rhoads Industries, Inc. and Rhoads Marine Industries, Inc. (collectively “Rhoads”) Response in Opposition (Doc. 183), for the reasons set out in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ request for reconsideration is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ David R. Strawbridge, USMJ DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?