BANKS v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 7 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND HIS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY SUBMITTING A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN NOON ON 9/18/2015. AS THERE IS NO JUST REASON FOR DELAY OF THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. DEFENDANTS WENDELL F. REED AND TONETTE PRAY ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THESE DEFENDANTS AS TERMINATED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 9/10/2015. 9/10/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN E. BANKS, SR.
COLWYN BOROUGH, ET AL.
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of defendants
Colwyn Borough, Wendell F. Reed, and Tonette Pray’s motion to dismiss (docket entry #7) and
the Memorandum issued this day , and plaintiff Kevin E. Banks’s response in opposition thereto,
and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to plaintiff’s ADA and
Section 1981 claims against defendant Colwyn Borough;
Plaintiff’s ADA and Section 1981 claims against defendant Colwyn
Borough are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to plaintiff’s PHRA
claims against defendants Wendell F. Reed and Tonette Pray;
Plaintiff’s PHRA claims against defendants Wendell F. Reed and Tonette
Pray in both their official and individual capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to plaintiff’s claim for
Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is DISMISSED WITH
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to plaintiff’s Title VII
claims against defendant Colwyn Borough;
Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to amend his first amended complaint by
submitting a second amendment complaint no later than noon on September 18, 2015;
Defendant Colwyn Borough shall ANSWER or appropriately RESPOND
to plaintiff’s second amended complaint no later than fourteen days after being served with the
second amended complaint; and
As there is no just reason for delay of the entry of judgment, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), defendants Wendell F. Reed and Tonette Pray are DISMISSED from this
case and the Clerk of Court shall MARK these defendants as TERMINATED.
BY THE COURT:
_/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J.
Stewart Dalzell, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?