ZASLOW et al v. COLEMAN et al
Filing
19
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF NO. 2) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT AND THE LANHAM ACT, PLEAD AT COUNTS I AND II OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS' REM AINING STATE LAW CLAIMS, PLEAD AT COUNTS III THROUGH IX OF THE COMPLAINT, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (ECF NO. 12) AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NOS 15 AND 17) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/5/2015. 5/5/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jmg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VALORI L. ZASLOW, ET AL.
:
:
:
:
:
v.
WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, III, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1272
ORDER
AND NOW, this
5th
day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2), and all papers and exhibits submitted in
support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2) is DENIED.
2.
Plaintiffs’ claims under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., and the
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., plead at Counts I and II of the Complaint, are
DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.
Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims, plead at Counts III through IX of the
Complaint, are DISMISSED without prejudice.
4.
Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 12) and Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (ECF Nos. 15 and 17) are DENIED as moot.
The Clerk of Courts shall mark this action closed.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?