ZASLOW et al v. COLEMAN et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF NO. 2) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT AND THE LANHAM ACT, PLEAD AT COUNTS I AND II OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS' REM AINING STATE LAW CLAIMS, PLEAD AT COUNTS III THROUGH IX OF THE COMPLAINT, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (ECF NO. 12) AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NOS 15 AND 17) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/5/2015. 5/5/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jmg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VALORI L. ZASLOW, ET AL. : : : : : v. WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, III, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1272 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2), and all papers and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs’ claims under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., plead at Counts I and II of the Complaint, are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims, plead at Counts III through IX of the Complaint, are DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 12) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 15 and 17) are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this action closed. BY THE COURT: R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?