WEN v. WILLIS et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANTS ROBERT E. WILLIS, FOXCODE, INC., AND FOXCODE CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT'S REPLED BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY CLAIM 24 , PLAINTIFF HANDONG WEN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION THERETO 28 , AND THE DEFENDANTS' REPLY 29 , AND FOR THE REASONS PROVIDED IN THE COURT'S OPINION OF OCTOBER 22, 2015, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (1)THE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VII (BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY) AGAINST DEFENDANT F OXCODE CAPITAL MARKETS IS DENIED; (2)THE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VII (BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY) AGAINST DEFENDANTS ROBERT E. WILLIS AND FOXCODE INC. IS GRANTED; COUNT VII OF THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANT S ROBERT E. WILLIS AND FOXCODE INC; AND (3)DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 10/22/15. 10/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HANDONG WEN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 15-1328 ROBERT E. WILLIS and FOXCODE, INC., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the Defendants Robert E. Willis, Foxcode, Inc., and Foxcode Capital Markets, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint’s Repled Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim [ECF No. 24]; Plaintiff Handong Wen’s response in opposition thereto [ECF No. 28]; and the Defendants’ Reply [ECF No. 29], and for the reasons provided in the Court’s Opinion of October 22, 2015, IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) the motion to dismiss Count VII (breach of fiduciary duty) against Defendant Foxcode Capital Markets is DENIED; (2) the motion to dismiss Count VII (breach of fiduciary duty) against Defendants Robert E. Willis and Foxcode Inc. is GRANTED; Count VII of the Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against Defendants Robert E. Willis and Foxcode Inc.; and (3) Defendants SHALL ANSWER Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. BY THE COURT: /S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?